1996 MG RV8 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 MG RV8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 MG RV8 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 MG RV8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 MG RV8 (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 MG RV8 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 1996 MG RV8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 MG RV8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 MG RV8 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | MG | Mazda |
| Model | RV8 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
