1996 Mini MK VI vs. 1949 Simca 8
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,090 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca 8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mini MK VI (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1949 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Simca 8 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 1949 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 1949 Simca 8 | |
Make | Mini | Simca |
Model | MK VI | 8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |