1996 Mini MK VI vs. 1973 Seat 1430

To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Seat 1430. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Seat 1430 would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Seat 1430 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Seat 1430 (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Seat 1430 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Seat 1430 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Seat 1430 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Seat 1430. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Seat 1430 (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1973 Seat 1430 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.

Compare all specifications: