1996 Mini MK VI vs. 1978 Seat 127
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,010 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Seat 127 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Seat 127 (51 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Seat 127 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Seat 127 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Seat 127 (76 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1978 Seat 127 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mini MK VI | 1978 Seat 127 | |
| Make | Mini | Seat |
| Model | MK VI | 127 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 76 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2230 mm |
