1996 Mini MK VI vs. 1983 Volvo 760

To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 760 (156 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 760 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 760 (234 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.

Compare all specifications: