1996 Mini MK VI vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Clio weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Renault Clio (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1990 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK VI | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |