1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2000 Pininfarina Rossa
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 5,472 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (485 HP) has 444 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pininfarina Rossa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (570 Nm) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm). This means 2000 Pininfarina Rossa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 2000 Pininfarina Rossa | |
Make | Mini | Pininfarina |
Model | MK VI | Rossa |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 5472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 485 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |