1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mini MK VI | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mini | Ford |
| Model | MK VI | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2490 mm |
