1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (285 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mini | Volvo |
Model | MK VI | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |