1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 550 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Mini | Mitsubishi |
Model | MK VI | Lancer |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |