1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2005 Zastava 103
To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Zastava 103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Zastava 103 (59 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Zastava 103 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Zastava 103 (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Zastava 103 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mini MK VI | 2005 Zastava 103 | |
| Make | Mini | Zastava |
| Model | MK VI | 103 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
