1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mini MK VI | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mini | Holden |
| Model | MK VI | Epica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
