1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mini MK VI | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mini | Nissan |
| Model | MK VI | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2640 mm |
