1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mini | Holden |
Model | MK VI | Colorado |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |