1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2010 SSC Aero

To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 1021 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Aero weights approximately 673 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 SSC Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SSC Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1288 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.

Compare all specifications: