1996 Mini MK VI vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mini MK VI | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mini | Nissan |
Model | MK VI | Micra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2449 mm |