1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1960 Skoda 1200
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Skoda 1200. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1960 Skoda 1200.
Because 1960 Skoda 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Skoda 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Skoda 1200. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1960 Skoda 1200 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | Carisma | 1200 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
