1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1962 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Because 1962 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Skoda 1202. (87 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1962 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | Carisma | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
