1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8.
Because 1965 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1965 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Carisma | 8 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 955 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
