1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1965 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Corona. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Corona.
Because 1965 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Corona. (115 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1965 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Carisma | Corona |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |