1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1968 Seat 600
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600.
Because 1968 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1968 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Carisma | 600 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |