1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1968 Simca 1000
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1968 Simca 1000. (38 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1968 Simca 1000.
Because 1968 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Simca 1000. (59 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1968 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Simca |
Model | Carisma | 1000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |