1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1976 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Because 1976 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1976 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | Carisma | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
