1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1979 Zastava 1500

To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1500.

Because 1979 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: