1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1980 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Corolla. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1980 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Corolla. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1980 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Carisma | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
