1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. Both 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1990 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,870 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1990 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Carisma | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
