1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
| Model | Carisma | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
