1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2003 Acura RL
To start off, 2003 Acura RL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RL (225 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RL (313 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm). This means 2003 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. 2003 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2003 Acura RL | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | Carisma | RL |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |