1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Carisma | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |