1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Carisma | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
