1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2007 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2007 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2007 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Carisma | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1570 mm |