1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Carisma | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2014 mm |