1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2010 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2010 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Carisma | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1816 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
