1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Carisma | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1473 mm |
