1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Carisma | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1826 mm |