1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (242 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1965 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Challenger | 4 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
