1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1967 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 965 kg more than 1967 TVR Tuscan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1967 TVR Tuscan | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | TVR |
| Model | Challenger | Tuscan |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2290 mm |
