1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1977 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 882 kg more than 1977 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1977 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 948 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |