1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1978 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1978 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1978 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Challenger | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2110 mm |