1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1984 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 665 kg more than 1984 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1984 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Celica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
