1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1988 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 806 kg more than 1988 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1988 Ford Telstar | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | Telstar |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
