1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1998 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1998 Nissan Cima is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 294 kg more than 1998 Nissan Cima.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1998 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Cima |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |