1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2000 Volvo V40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 550 kg more than 2000 Volvo V40.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Challenger | V40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2570 mm |