1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 104 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Challenger | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |