1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2004 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Grand Espace weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2004 Renault Grand Espace | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Grand Espace |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |