1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 575 kg more than 2004 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Challenger | S40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |