1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 655 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |