1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2005 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 60 kg more than 2005 Renault Grand Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2005 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |