1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,835 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (138 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
| Model | Challenger | 207 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1358 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
