1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | SsangYong |
| Model | Challenger | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
